Resonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal: Court Versus Human Resource Decisions
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Lam, Helen (Author)
- Devine, Kay (Author)
Title
Resonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal: Court Versus Human Resource Decisions
Abstract
This study identifies and compares the severance compensation determinants of legal and human resource professionals, using court cases and policy-capturing HR survey. Results confirmed that HR practitioners not only considered the factors critical in court decisions, which were length of service, age, employment status, and labor market conditions, but also had economic and social justice concerns as revealed by significant factors such as a company's financial situation and reason for dismissal. Certain HR decision-makers' characteristics were also found to influence the decision. Overall, HR notices were shorter than court notices in similar situations. Implications of such findings are discussed.
Publication
Relations Industrielles
Volume
56
Issue
2
Pages
365-393
Date
Spring 2001
Language
English
ISSN
0034379X
Short Title
Resonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal
Accessed
3/10/15, 12:13 AM
Rights
Copyright Universite Laval - Departement des Relations Industrielles Spring 2001
Citation
Lam, H., & Devine, K. (2001). Resonable Notice for Wrongful Dismissal: Court Versus Human Resource Decisions. Relations Industrielles, 56(2), 365–393. http://www.erudit.org/revue/ri/2001/v56/n2/index.html
Link to this record