Reinstatement in arbitration: The grievors' perspective

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Reinstatement in arbitration: The grievors' perspective
Abstract
Virtually absent in the arbitration literature is the voice of the grievor. Post-reinstatement experiences are examined primarily from the perspectives of a group of 7 Alberta grievors. First, a review is presented of the declining frequency of Alberta arbitrations, the extent to which dismissal cases form a proportion of the arbitral caseload, and the relatively low rate of reinstatement. Findings are: 1. Grievors are unaware of the public availability of arbitration awards. 2. Reinstated grievors are critical of the union that successfully defended them. 3. They have a more benign view of management. 4. Very little reinstatement assistance is offered. 5. Grievors' positive attitudes to their worksites are more determinative if successful reinstatement than remorse and acceptance of culpability.
Publication
Relations Industrielles
Volume
55
Issue
2
Pages
227-249
Date
Spring 2000
Language
English
ISSN
0034379X
Short Title
Reinstatement in arbitration
Accessed
3/9/15, 11:58 PM
Library Catalog
ProQuest
Rights
Copyright Les Presses de L'Universite Laval Spring 2000
Citation
Williams, K., & Taras, D. G. (2000). Reinstatement in arbitration: The grievors’ perspective. Relations Industrielles, 55(2), 227–249. http://www.erudit.org/revue/ri/2000/v55/n2/051307ar.html?vue=resume