Poverty Policy: Historic Institutional Approaches to Poor Relief in Canada

In Canada, social assistance programs act as a ‘safety net’ to prevent those living in poverty from reaching destitution. However, this safety net comes with expectations – in the form of welfare-to-work programs that mandate beneficiaries’ participation in work-related activities. Underlying these welfare-to-work programs are ideas surrounding citizenship, activation, dependency, and the role of the state in supporting the welfare of its citizens. Embedded in these programs are the ideas of market citizenship and activation, two ideas that tell the story of the ideal citizen in Canada: a self-sufficient and appropriately activated market citizen, who fulfils their obligation of supporting themselves through participation in paid employment. Subsequently, through the ideas of market citizenship and activation, social assistance beneficiaries represent the antagonist to the ideal citizen: an unmotivated, dependent, support-needing citizen. Although scholars often situate the emergence of the ideas of market citizenship and activation during the late 20th century period of welfare reform in Canada, this perspective negates the history of these ideas in social assistance policies. Informed by the theory of Critical Human Ecology and the methodology of Ideational Analysis, this thesis explores the development of the ideas of market citizenship and activation across institutional approaches to poor relief in Canada. By taking a long-term historical perspective, this thesis finds evidence of the ideas of market citizenship and activation as early as the 17th century in Canadian institutional approaches to poor relief, and counters the prevailing perspective that market citizenship and activation emerged in the late 20th century in Canadian institutional approaches to poor relief.