Contradictions and Limitations of Final Offer Selection: The Manitoba Experience; A Comment

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Contradictions and Limitations of Final Offer Selection: The Manitoba Experience; A Comment
Abstract
The short-lived experiment with final-offer selection (FOS) arbitration in Manitoba has evoked considerable conflict and controversy. Not only did business oppose FOS, but also the labor movement fought over and split on the issue. FOS was addressed to a real problem now facing organized labor, namely, the need to assist workers in the small, relatively weak bargaining units found in the fastest growing sectors of the economy in order to counter the changing structure of the labor force and the related decline in union membership. However, FOS addressed this problem by creating the risk that unions' willingness and capacity to strike would be eroded. In a comment, Grant argues that FOS has not been widely embraced by trade unions representing weaker bargaining units and that the researchers seem to take lightly the principle of free collective bargaining because, by submitting a dispute to a selector, the employer's right to engage in a work stoppage was unilaterally suspended.
Publication
Relations Industrielles
Volume
45
Issue
1
Pages
146
Date
Winter 1990
Language
English
ISSN
0034379X
Short Title
Contradictions and Limitations of Final Offer Selection
Accessed
2/4/15, 3:11 AM
Library Catalog
ProQuest
Rights
Copyright Universite Laval - Departement des Relations Industrielles Winter 1990
Citation
Black, E., Silver, J., & Grant, H. M. (1990). Contradictions and Limitations of Final Offer Selection: The Manitoba Experience; A Comment. Relations Industrielles, 45(1), 146. http://www.erudit.org/revue/ri/1990/v45/n1/050565ar.html?vue=resume