Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness: Validating the Conceptual Structure

Resource type
Authors/contributors
Title
Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness: Validating the Conceptual Structure
Abstract
The aim of this study is to conceptualize and empirically validate the "perceived fairness in the context of collective bargaining", which refers to employees' justice perceptions formed during the collective bargaining process. Using confirmatory factor analyses (CFA) and hierarchical regressions, we find support for discriminant, convergent, and predictive validity. Overall, the results show that this concept includes eight distinct dimensions, combining the two sources of (in)justice (employer and union) and the four types of justice perceptions: procedural, distributive, relational (interpersonal) and informational justice. Employees clearly distinguish eight justice dimensions, which have a differential effect on their attitudes: trust in the employer and satisfaction with the union. Adding to the structural model (Leventhal, 1980) and the process control model (Thibaut and Walker, 1975), this study highlights new bases of justice: usefulness and profitability (cost-benefits ratio).
Publication
Relations Industrielles
Volume
67
Issue
3
Pages
398-425
Date
Summer 2012
Language
English
ISSN
0034379X
Short Title
Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness
Accessed
3/25/15, 3:47 PM
Library Catalog
ProQuest
Rights
Copyright Universite Laval - Departement des Relations Industrielles Summer 2012
Citation
Cloutier, J., Denis, P. L., & Bilodeau, H. (2012). Collective Bargaining and Perceived Fairness: Validating the Conceptual Structure. Relations Industrielles, 67(3), 398–425. http://www.erudit.org/revue/ri/2012/v67/n3/index.html