Collective Bargaining
Resource type
Author/contributor
- Slinn, Sara (Author)
Title
Collective Bargaining
Abstract
This research project reviews and evaluates the academic literature relating to obtaining and maintaining collective bargaining rights under the OLRA. Research indicates that procedural changes to representation processes including the mandatory representation vote significantly reduced the likelihood of certification, and that these effects were concentrated in more vulnerable units. This may partly be due to greater opportunity for delay and employer resistance under vote procedure compared to under card-based certification. The research also indicates that delay has significant effects on certification outcomes, as do ULP complaints and employer resistance tactics. ULPs have negative long-term effects, and are associated with difficulties in bargaining and early decertification. Research also suggests that employer resistance, including ULPs, is common and often intentional. Little research on decertification exists, but offers some indication that employer actions contribute to decertification, and that decertification is concentrated in smaller, low-skill, low bargaining power units.
Report Number
178
Series Title
Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents
Place
Toronto
Institution
Ontario Ministry of Labour, Changing Workplaces Review
Date
2015
Pages
125 pages
Language
English
Citation
Slinn, S. (2015). Collective Bargaining (No. 178; Commissioned Reports, Studies and Public Policy Documents, p. 125 pages). Ontario Ministry of Labour, Changing Workplaces Review. https://digitalcommons.osgoode.yorku.ca/reports/178
Link to this record