Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement
Resource type
Title
Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement
Abstract
A majority of the Board (the union representative dissenting) is of opinion that unless the obeying of an order would constitute an infraction of the law or a safety or health hazard to the employee, the order should be obeyed. Quebec Iron and Titanium Corporation and l'Union des Ouvriers du Fer et du Titanium de Sorel. Jules Poisson, J. Président; Raymond Caron, Company representative; Gérard Picard, union représentative, dissenting. Ministère du Travail, Province de Québec, Bulletin d'Information, no. 1553, 15 mai 1961.
Publication
Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations
Publisher
Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval
Date
1961
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
344-346
Journal Abbr
ri
Citation Key
DisciplinaryMeasuresWhere1961
Accessed
9/10/21, 5:36 PM
ISSN
0034-379X, 1703-8138
Language
English
Citation
Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement. (1961). Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 16(3), 344–346. https://doi.org/10.7202/1021772ar
Link to this record