Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement

Resource type
Title
Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement
Abstract
A majority of the Board (the union representative dissenting) is of opinion that unless the obeying of an order would constitute an infraction of the law or a safety or health hazard to the employee, the order should be obeyed. Quebec Iron and Titanium Corporation and l'Union des Ouvriers du Fer et du Titanium de Sorel. Jules Poisson, J. Président; Raymond Caron, Company representative; Gérard Picard, union représentative, dissenting. Ministère du Travail, Province de Québec, Bulletin d'Information, no. 1553, 15 mai 1961.
Publication
Relations industrielles / Industrial Relations
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
344-346
Date
1961
Journal Abbr
ri
Language
English
ISSN
0034-379X, 1703-8138
Accessed
9/10/21, 5:36 PM
Extra
Publisher: Département des relations industrielles de l’Université Laval
Citation
Disciplinary Measures Where Exists an Alleged Violation of a Collective Agreement. (1961). Relations Industrielles / Industrial Relations, 16(3), 344–346. https://doi.org/10.7202/1021772ar