Organizational Analysis of Canadian Supported Employment Programs for People with Psychiatric Disabilities
Resource type
Authors/contributors
- Menear, Matthew (Author)
- Reinharz, Daniel (Author)
- Marc Corbière (Author)
- Houle, Nathalie (Author)
- Lanctôt, Nathalie (Author)
- Goering, Paula (Author)
- Goldner, Elliot M. (Author)
- Kirsh, Bonnie (Author)
- Lecomte, Tania (Author)
Title
Organizational Analysis of Canadian Supported Employment Programs for People with Psychiatric Disabilities
Abstract
Supported employment (SE) is widely considered to be the most effective intervention for helping people with psychiatric disabilities integrate into the competitive workforce. While fidelity to principles and standards of evidence-based SE, i.e. the Individual Placement and Support model, is positively associated with vocational outcomes, studies have revealed significant heterogeneity in SE programs implemented in Canada. This qualitative study thus aimed to shed light on organizational and contextual factors influencing SE implementation in three Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Ontario and Quebec). The study adopted several key concepts from the field of organizational studies (e.g. coalitions, archetypes, isomorphism) to guide data collection and analysis. Overall, 20 SE programs provided by 15 different agencies were examined. Findings revealed that agencies’ exposure to different institutional pressures, their interactions and relationships with other groups and organizations, as well as their values, beliefs and ideologies played determining roles in shaping the evolution of SE services in each province.
Publication
Social Science & Medicine
Volume
72
Issue
7
Pages
1028-1035
Date
April 2011
Journal Abbr
Social Science & Medicine
Language
English
ISSN
0277-9536
Accessed
2/15/15, 4:02 PM
Citation
Menear, M., Reinharz, D., Marc Corbière, Houle, N., Lanctôt, N., Goering, P., Goldner, E. M., Kirsh, B., & Lecomte, T. (2011). Organizational Analysis of Canadian Supported Employment Programs for People with Psychiatric Disabilities. Social Science & Medicine, 72(7), 1028–1035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.005
Link to this record