Your search
Results 4 resources
-
The article reviews the book, "Spaces of Global Capitalism: Towards a Theory of Uneven Geographical Development," by David Harvey.
-
‘Just transition’ to a green economy has been touted for its perceived ability to shift us towards both green capitalism and an eco-socialist future. The promise of a ‘Green New Deal’, as popularised by progressive politicians, was reinforced at the start of the global COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. Links were quickly made to the importance of reorientating economic production towards health and well-being and the implementation of green investment as a means of stimulating the economy and avoiding a depression – as well as saving the planet. This chapter explores the limits of just transition to a ‘greener’ and more ‘caring’ economy and the persistent challenges that reproduce fragmented labour. A call is made to de-commodify labour as a more transformative response to the current environmental and health crisis.
-
Recent debates on ‘socio-ecological fixes’ explore how the reproduction of capital is pursued through the appropriation of land and resources and/or by means of fixing capital within the materiality of ‘Nature’. This chapter questions how the formal and real subsumption of Nature shapes the lives of workers and the politics of labour. These arguments are grounded through investigating two ‘fixes’ in the forests of British Columbia (BC), Canada. First, I examine how the labour of unemployed men in Depression-era BC was enrolled into relief camps in order to establish infrastructure aimed at accelerating the growth of timber production in the 1930s. Second, I explore how the financial acquisition of private forest lands on Vancouver Island in the early 2000s resulted in heavy job losses. Through profiling these two fixes against one another, the chapter explores how the formal and real subsumption of Nature shapes the lives, organisation, and politics of labour.
-
This chapter explores the development of Anglophonic Labour Geography, both as a distinct and identifiable subfield of Anglophonic Human Geography and as an intellectual and political project concerned with how workers actively shape the spatial dynamics of capitalism. I examine how capital-L ‘Labour Geography’ and diverse, small-L labour geographies have evolved to address the issues raised and challenges posed over the last decade, contributing to what Peck (2018, p. 475) called Labour Geography's current ‘more reflective and autocritical phase’. Through narrating my experiences of teaching undergraduates since I developed my first labour geographies course in 2014, I pose two questions of this current phase: in what ways is it expansive, and, relatedly, who sees themselves as ‘labour geographers’?
Explore
Resource type
- Book Section (3)
- Journal Article (1)
Publication year
-
Between 2000 and 2026
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)
- 2008 (1)
-
Between 2020 and 2026
(3)
- 2025 (3)
-
Between 2000 and 2009
(1)